New Domestic Violence Laws Proposed For Tennessee

Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam announced a new plan to increase punishment for certain crimes . One of these proposals is to increase jail time for those convicted of domestic violence.Gov. Haslam based his plan on a recent study that ranked Tennessee fifth in the nation in the  rate its women are murdered by men. The plan seeks mandatory minimum sentences of 45 days in jail for a second domestic violence conviction and a minimum 120 days in jail for a third or more conviction.

Society needs to address the domestic violence issue . However mandatory minimum sentencing is not the answer. Most politicians want to be tough on crime and enact tough laws to make them look good to the public. Two things happen when the government enacts mandatory minimum punishment. First , it takes discretion out of the judges hands in sentencing. By that , most judges want to make a difference and try to be creative with sentencing alternatives like domestic violence counseling. Mandatory minimum punishment takes that away from the court. Secondly , mandatory punishment gives the district attorneys took much power to cram down plea bargains to those accused of a crime . Take a deal avoid jail or go to trial and if you lose visit the jail. There is to much potential for abuse  in making mandatory minimums the answer to all that's wrong in the criminal justice system.

Hawaii Allows Parental Disciple Defense

The State Supreme Court of Hawaii ruled that a man convicted of punching his stepson should have been allowed to raise parental discipline as a defense in his trial. The trial court rejected that defense because the boy's nose was broke by the defendant who wanted him to clean a carpet stain. The case is remanded back to the trial court for a new trial.

The defense requested a jury instruction on parental discipline defense . In Hawaii , the law provides such a defense.

In order to invoke the parental discipline defense, a defendant is required to make a showing that the record contained some evidence supporting the following elements:

(1) [the defendant] was a parent, guardian, or other person as described in HRS § 703-309(1); (2) [the defendant] used force against a minor for whose care and supervision he was responsible; (3) his [or her] use of force was with due regard to the age and size of the recipient and reasonably related to the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the welfare of the minor, including the prevention or punishment of misconduct; and (4) the force used was not designed to cause, or known to create a risk of causing, substantial bodily injury, disfigurement, extreme pain or mental distress, or neurological damage.
Tennessee has no such defense that is contained in the Tennessee Pattern Jury Instructions.

Alleged Stalkers In Tennessee May Have To Wear a GPS

The Tennessee State Senate passed a bill ( SB 567/HB 685) that would authorize a magistrate to order any defendant who is arrested for stalking or a domestic violence charge to carry or wear a GPS device. The device would notify the alleged victim if the defendant is at or near a location the defendant has been ordered to stay away from .

Currently , Tennessee law has in place conditions of release on bond . Those bond conditions have been on the books for years. It appears those measures have been adequate to protect an alleged victim until the court decides the case . In Davidson County , Tennessee , the cost of GPS monitoring is $10.00 per day . Now , it appears the state of Tennessee wants to put everyone accused of a crime on GPS or sometime of electronic surveillance. Gang members , those accused of DUI , and now  those accused of domestic violence  are subject to the GPS device .

Big brother now has an eye in the sky and they want to look at everyone . Forget about the process of getting a warrant , the presumption of innocence , and the cost to the defendant . Heaven forbid they are innocent of the charges .

What's next GPS on all those that have an an order of protection against them ?

Williamson County Domestic Violence Cases On The Rise

Jill Cecil Wiersma  reported on the rise of domestic violence cases in Williamson County , Tennessee.Here's the data;

  • Spring Hill , Tn. Police report over 189 verbal or physical assaults this year.Domestic violence charges are the number one crime surpassing auto burglary.
  • Brentwood ,Tn Police report 45 domestic violence charges.
  • Franklin , Tn. Police department report 202 year to date domestic violence  reports.

Spring Hill Police Lt. Justin Hill states that neighbors report loud noise that police then investigate.Brentwood,Tn. Police Captain Tommy Walsh advised that the larger yards preclude neighbors from hearing any domestic fights and the calls come from inside the home.

Do the police have a right to come into your home based solely on a neighbors complaint of loud noise ? Probably not.

Article I, Section 7 of the Tennessee Constitution provides ;

 

 

That the people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers

and possessions, from unreasonable searches and seizures; and that general

warrants, whereby an officer may be commanded to search suspected places,

without evidence of the fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not

named, whose offenses are not particularly described and supported by evidence,

are dangerous to liberty and ought not be granted.

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Violations of Orders of Protection in Tennessee

In Tennessee , it is unlawful to violate an order of protection issued by a court. A violation of  an order of protection is governed under Tennessee Code Annotated 39-13-114.A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor. The legal twist with this law is it requires it to be served consecutively to to the sentence for any other offense that is based upon the same factual allegation.

The teaching points are ;

  • Contest the order of protection.
  • Obey the order if the court grants it.

Who is a Domestic Violence Victim?

Just who is a domestic violence victim?  Well, the Tennessee State Legislature defines who is a domestic violence victim by statute.  I am glad it is defined because it eliminates any debate. Here's the definition straight from the Tennessee Code.


     
 
 

39-13-111. Domestic assault. —

 
 
 

     
 
 

(a)  As used in this section, “domestic abuse victim” means any person who falls within the following categories:

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (1)  Adults or minors who are current or former spouses;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  Adults or minors who live together or who have lived together;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (3)  Adults or minors who are dating or who have dated or who have or had a sexual relationship, but does not include fraternization between two (2) individuals in a business or social context;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (4)  Adults or minors related by blood or adoption;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (5)  Adults or minors who are related or were formerly related by marriage; or

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (6)  Adult or minor children of a person in a relationship that is described in subdivisions (a)(1)-(5).

 
 
 
     
 
 

(b)  A person commits domestic assault who commits an assault as defined in § 39-13-101 against a domestic abuse victim.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(c)  (1)  Domestic assault is punishable the same as assault in § 39-13-101.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  In addition to any other punishment that may be imposed for a violation of this section, if, as determined by the court, the defendant possesses the ability to pay a fine in an amount not in excess of two hundred dollars ($200), then the court shall impose a fine at the level of the defendant's ability to pay, but not in excess of two hundred dollars ($200). The additional fine shall be paid to the clerk of the court imposing sentence, who shall transfer it to the state treasurer, who shall credit the fine to the general fund. All fines so credited to the general fund shall be subject to appropriation by the general assembly for the exclusive purpose of funding family violence shelters and shelter services. This appropriation shall be in addition to any amount appropriated pursuant to § 67-4-411.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (3)  A person convicted of a violation of this section shall be required to terminate, upon conviction, possession of all firearms that the person possesses as required by § 36-3-625.

 
 
 

[Acts 2000, ch. 824, § 1; 2002, ch. 649, § 3; 2008, ch. 744, § 1; 2009, ch. 455, § 4.]

Change at the Court House

Several days ago , I read a post by Scott Greenfield  on his blog Simple Justice . The theme of the post is that the courthouse has changed from a place where the average citizen could seek a fair trial to one dominated by the government. For example , Greenfield noted that the presence of policeman from manning the metal detectors to the display of firearms has changed the fabric of the courthouse from one of justice to that of a place of  law enforcement. I read the article and agreed with the conclusions then I had court in Murfreesboro , Tn. which drove the point home.

Domestic violence cases in Rutherford County are handled differently from most places in Tennessee. Here's the deal:

  • As the court calls the docket , it refers the alleged victim to a domestic violence coordinator who is not affiliated with the District Attorney's office.
  • The alleges victim is interviewed by the domestic violence coordinator who I have been advised may make recommendations to the Assistant District attorney that is handling the case.
  • Then the Assistant District Attorney interviews the alleged victim.

The whole point is the process where the court refers the witness to be interviewed. Is the court now a referee of the law or an active participant in the enforcement of the laws.Secondly , guess who funds these domestic violence coordinators in Rutherford County , Tennessee ? The defendants who pay court costs in criminal cases in General Sessions Courts in Rutherford county. I have been advised that a fee is assessed as court costs for all criminal cases except driving offenses to pay for these domestic violence coordinators. So , a MTSU student is convicted of simple possession of marijuana , he or she pays a fee to support this program. Is that court costs assessment fair or constitutional ?

 

Residual Effects of Domestic Violence

As I was leaving the Criminal Court in Nashville last Friday, I noticed a program being presented by the Nashville Coalition Against Domestic Violence.  Curious, I went inside, made a donation, and sat down.  The topic was "Children and Domestic Violence".  Lani Ramos presented on the "Effects of Trauma on Children" . Here's an excerpt from her presentation on the impact from birth to toddler.

The National Child Traumatic Stress Network has defined domestic violence as follows:

The term domestic violence is commonly defined as a behavior, or pattern of behaviors, that occurs between intimate partners with the aim of one partner exerting control over the other. Domestic violence may include psychological threats, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, and/or physical violence. This clinical definition is broader than the legal definition, which may be restricted to acts of physical harm. In the past twenty-five years, public awareness of the issue of domestic violence has grown tremendously. As the scope of the problem has become understood, domestic violence is now acknowledged as a significant legal and public health issue, not only a private family problem. There are laws in every state that make domestic violence illegal.

Studies by the National Child Traumatic Stress Network note : exposure to domestic  violence during the first 33 months of life puts a child in serious risk of cognitive and developmental impairments that may last a lifetime.  A child develops the ability to think, feel, and relate to others.  So, the template for development may be skewed.

Bottom line is that domestic violence effects all those around you.

Is Cyber Stalking Legal In Tennessee?

In yesterday's post, I posted Tennessee's law on stalking.  That provides a backdrop for today's blog post.  Cyber stalking is accomplished by text messaging or other means of electronic communication.  I spoke with an Assistant District Attorney here in Nashville,TN who handles domestic violence cases, and he reported that he recently prosecuted a case in which cyber stalking was done via Facebook messages.

An article in the Washington Post  illustrates the growing problem in dating violence.  The Post reported that one women received over 758 texts in one day.  Cyber stalking may also be involved in the Virginia lacrosse player's murder.  The defendant in her murder case removed the computer when he fled the scene of the crime.

"What technology offers is irrefutable evidence of the abuse," says Cindy Southworth, founder of the Safety Net Project on technology at the National Network to End Domestic Violence, who says it helps in court and is hoping for an increase in conviction rates.

Most electronic communication leaves digital evidence of the contact.  Unconsented contact is defined in T.C.A. 39-17-315

   (5)  “Unconsented contact” means any contact with another person that is initiated or continued without that person's consent, or in disregard of that person's expressed desire that the contact be avoided or discontinued. Unconsented contact includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:

It includes sending mail or any electronic communications to that person.

So be careful what you say and how often you say it.

 

What is the Crime of Stalking in Tennessee ?

Stalking is a crime that is usually grouped in the various crimes that are classified as a domestic violence charge. So , I thought that providing a copy of Tennessee's stalking law may be helpful in discussing this topic.

Show Full Chapter Email This Page Print This Page

     
 
 

39-17-315. Stalking, aggravated stalking, and especially aggravated stalking. —

 
 
 

     
 
 

(a)  As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (1)  “Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of two (2) or more separate noncontinuous acts evidencing a continuity of purpose;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  “Emotional distress” means significant mental suffering or distress that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (3)  “Harassment” means conduct directed toward a victim that includes, but is not limited to, repeated or continuing unconsented contact that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress, and that actually causes the victim to suffer emotional distress. Harassment does not include constitutionally protected activity or conduct that serves a legitimate purpose;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (4)  “Stalking” means a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another individual that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested, and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (5)  “Unconsented contact” means any contact with another person that is initiated or continued without that person's consent, or in disregard of that person's expressed desire that the contact be avoided or discontinued. Unconsented contact includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (A)  Following or appearing within the sight of that person;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (B)  Approaching or confronting that person in a public place or on private property;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (C)  Appearing at that person's workplace or residence;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (D)  Entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, or occupied by that person;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (E)  Contacting that person by telephone;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (F)  Sending mail or electronic communications to that person; or

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (G)  Placing an object on, or delivering an object to, property owned, leased, or occupied by that person; and

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (6)  “Victim” means an individual who is the target of a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(b)  (1)  A person commits an offense who intentionally engages in stalking.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  Stalking is a Class A misdemeanor.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(c)  (1)  A person commits aggravated stalking who commits the offense of stalking as prohibited by subsection (b), and:

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (A)  In the course and furtherance of stalking, displays a deadly weapon;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (B)  The victim of the offense was less than eighteen (18) years of age at any time during the person's course of conduct, and the person is five (5) or more years older than the victim;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (C)  Has previously been convicted of stalking within seven (7) years of the instant offense;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (D)  Makes a credible threat to the victim, the victim's child, sibling, spouse, parent or dependents with the intent to place any such person in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury; or

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (E)  At the time of the offense, was prohibited from making contact with the victim under a restraining order or injunction for protection, an order of protection, or any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward the victim or the victim's property, and the person knowingly violates the injunction, order or court-imposed prohibition.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  Aggravated stalking is a Class E felony.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(d)  (1)  A person commits especially aggravated stalking who:

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (A)  Commits the offense of stalking or aggravated stalking, and has previously been convicted of stalking or aggravated stalking involving the same victim of the instant offense; or

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (B)  Commits the offense of aggravated stalking, and intentionally or recklessly causes serious bodily injury to the victim of the offense or to the victim's child, sibling, spouse, parent or dependent.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  Especially aggravated stalking is a Class C felony.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(e)  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the court grants probation to a person convicted of stalking, aggravated stalking or especially aggravated stalking, the court may keep the person on probation for a period not to exceed the maximum punishment for the appropriate classification of offense. Regardless of whether a term of probation is ordered, the court may, in addition to any other punishment otherwise authorized by law, order the defendant to do the following:

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (1)  Refrain from stalking any individual during the term of probation;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  Refrain from having any contact with the victim of the offense or the victim's child, sibling, spouse, parent or dependent;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (3)  Be evaluated to determine the need for psychiatric, psychological, or social counseling, and, if determined appropriate by the court, to receive psychiatric, psychological or social counseling at the defendant's own expense;

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (4)  If, as the result of such treatment or otherwise, the defendant is required to take medication, order that the defendant submit to drug testing or some other method by which the court can monitor whether the defendant is taking the required medication; and

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (5)  Submit to the use of an electronic tracking device, with the cost of the device and monitoring the defendant's whereabouts, to be paid by the defendant.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(f)  In a prosecution for a violation of this section, evidence that the defendant continued to engage in a course of conduct involving repeated unconsented contact with the victim after having been requested by the victim to discontinue the conduct or a different form of unconsented contact, and to refrain from any further unconsented contact with the victim, is prima facie evidence that the continuation of the course of conduct caused the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(g)  (1)  If a person is convicted of aggravated or especially aggravated stalking, or another felony offense arising out of a charge based on this section, the court may order an independent professional mental health assessment of the defendant's need for mental health treatment. The court may waive the assessment, if an adequate assessment was conducted prior to the conviction.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  If the assessment indicates that the defendant is in need of and amenable to mental health treatment, the court may include in the sentence a requirement that the offender undergo treatment, and that the drug intake of the defendant be monitored in the manner best suited to the particular situation. Monitoring may include periodic determinations as to whether the defendant is ingesting any illegal controlled substances, as well as determinations as to whether the defendant is complying with any required or recommended course of treatment that includes the taking of medications.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (3)  The court shall order the offender to pay the costs of assessment under this subsection (g), unless the offender is indigent under § 40-14-202.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(h)  Any person who reasonably believes they are a victim of an offense under this section, regardless of whether the alleged perpetrator has been arrested, charged or convicted of a stalking-related offense, shall be entitled to seek and obtain an order of protection in the same manner, and under the same circumstances, as is provided for victims of domestic abuse by the provisions of title 36, chapter 3, part 6.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(i)  When a person is charged and arrested for the offense of stalking, aggravated stalking or especially aggravated stalking, the arresting law enforcement officer shall inform the victim that the person arrested may be eligible to post bail for the offense and to be released until the date of trial for the offense.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(j)  If a law enforcement officer or district attorney general believes that the life of a possible victim of stalking is in immediate danger, unless and until sufficient evidence can be processed linking a particular person to the offense, the district attorney general may petition the judge of a court of record having criminal jurisdiction in that district to enter an order expediting the processing of any evidence in a particular stalking case. If, after hearing the petition, the court is of the opinion that the life of the victim may be in immediate danger if the alleged perpetrator is not apprehended, the court may enter such an order, directed to the Tennessee bureau of investigation, or any other agency or laboratory that may be in the process of analyzing evidence for that particular investigation.

 
 
 
     
 
 

(k)  (1)  For purposes of determining if a course of conduct amounting to stalking is a single offense or multiple offenses, the occurrence of any of the following events breaks the continuous course of conduct, with respect to the same victim, that constitutes the offense:

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (A)  The defendant is arrested and charged with stalking, aggravated stalking or especially aggravated stalking;

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (B)  The defendant is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have violated an order of protection issued to prohibit the defendant from engaging in the conduct of stalking; or

 
 
 
     
 
 

          (C)  The defendant is convicted of the offense of stalking, aggravated stalking or especially aggravated stalking.

 
 
 
     
 
 

     (2)  If a continuing course of conduct amounting to stalking engaged in by a defendant against the same victim is broken by any of the events set out in subdivision (k)(1), any such conduct that occurs after that event commences a new and separate offense.

Continue Reading...

Should The Sword of Justice Cut Both Ways ?

 Normally , I don't discuss my cases for the this blog  for  many reasons .However , this story bears mentioning. Yesterday , I was in General Sessions Court in Gallatin, Tennessee representing someone  on a domestic  violence charge.The alleged victim did not show up as well as the police officer who took out the warrant. I moved for a dismissal for failure to prosecute the criminal charges.The court continued the case on the state's motion.I had to appear , my client had to appear and we had to prepare for court. If she did not show up , a failure to appear charge would be filed and the bond could be increased or revoked. Different result for my client verses the state.

Therefore , the question is "Should the sword of justice cut both ways." Yes it should , but it's not the reality.

What is a Domestic Violence Charge ?

Domestic Violence or domestic assault charges are different from simple assault charges in Tennessee. In fact ,The General Sessions Courts in Nashville even have specialized courts established to handle these sorts of cases.Judge Gale Robinson and Judge Gloria Dumas are the two judges that are assigned to hear these cases at the General Sessions Court level.

I thought it might be helpful to set forth the definition of Domestic assault.The definition can be found at Tennessee Code annotated Section 39-13-111.

 


A " domestic abuse victim" means any person who falls within the following categories:


 

(1) Adults or minors who are current or former spouses;

(2) Adults or minors who live together or who have lived together;

(3) Adults or minors who are dating or who have dated or who have or had a sexual relationship, but does not include fraternization between two (2) individuals in a business or social context;

(4) Adults or minors related by blood or adoption;

(5) Adults or minors who are related or were formerly related by marriage; or

(6) Adult or minor children of a person in a relationship that is described in subdivisions (a)(1)-(5).

(b) A person commits domestic assault who commits an assault as defined in § 39-13-101 against a domestic abuse victim.

(c)(1) Domestic assault is punishable the same as assault in § 39-13-101.

One consequence of a domestic violence conviction is the loss of owning a firearm.See T.C.A. 39-19-111 (3)

(3) A person convicted of a violation of this section shall be required to terminate, upon conviction, possession of all firearms that the person possesses as required by § 36-3-625.